warrmr wrote:
apart from the avalabiltiy of G60 parts what benafit would you haev over Seat Cupra parts. ( apart fom g60 are 2 pot and cupra are 4 pot bremo the same as the fabia VRS) IIRC there both 305mm disks (11" inches)
another point to note is that not all 100bhp mk4 (6n)polos have rear disks. i its only post 1998 that have them.
i took my conversion from a 1999/2000 reg MK5 Polo 1.9 diesl. as they have bigger brakes and 14" steel wheels.
You answered the first question yourself

indeed, Cupra brakes will have the preference, there are also enough up-grades available for these brakes. But a standard Corrado is doing 160BHP, like he is, and weighs about 233 kilo's more then a standard 1.4 8v mk4 Polo, so the 2-pots G60 calipers will definately generate enough braking power, especially combined with up-grade parts like different discs and pads. Since these discs also aren't that "wide" (280mm) and considering the (possibly) low weight of the car (I don't know how much the weight increased after installing the V-Tec engine), I would personally go for the G60 set-up, since I believe it will be mroe then sufficient, and have less chance of "blocking" the wheels (and more "road-driving-proof" if you understand what i mean by that)
About the rear-axle, I didn't know not all 1.4 16v 100BHP editions had rear-discs

in Holland they do actually, probably a difference between nations. But the 1.4 16v 100BHP mk4 was only introduced in late 1997 here in Holland, so that's probably the explaination there aren't any ones here with drums on the rear-axle.
By the way, a positive thing about the Cupra braking (at least for the rear ones, from a Leon, probably for the Ibiza's too, as for the front side) the calipers aren't made of steel, but a leightweight alloy, I believe aluminium, but correct me if I'm wrong about the material, the point is, they lighter then Polo mk4 ones
