Page 1 of 3
BHP
Posted: Thu Jun 22, 2006 12:32 am
by ollie*
What is the BHP of the.......
1.4 16 valve model??
1.6 GL model??
Posted: Thu Jun 22, 2006 8:30 am
by James14100
1.4 16v is 100BHP
1.6 GL is 75BHP
The 16 valver is the way to go though if your trying to pick between the 2
James
Posted: Thu Jun 22, 2006 4:32 pm
by ollie*
1.4 16 Valve is 100 BHP
More power than a Saxo VTR!!
what do they compare like???
Posted: Thu Jun 22, 2006 5:32 pm
by ModifiedMadness
Get a GTi
Posted: Thu Jun 22, 2006 5:57 pm
by the mint with the hole
Yeh the valver stinks all over everything, i wouldnt mind one.. but i like mine too much.
Posted: Fri Jun 23, 2006 9:30 am
by James14100
Gti definatly better - 125BHP 0-60 8.9secs
Best thing to go for, prices have come down quite alot. You can pick one up for £4k
James
Posted: Fri Jun 23, 2006 9:38 am
by loud
i was going to get a gti, but my insurance was going to be triple what i am for my 100bhp mk5 valver
Posted: Fri Jun 23, 2006 12:21 pm
by henry01
ollie* wrote:1.4 16 Valve is 100 BHP
More power than a Saxo VTR!!
what do they compare like???
yeah but i've heard the VTS s**t all over the gti, still its a saxo...s**t!
Posted: Fri Jun 23, 2006 12:58 pm
by Redline
henry01 wrote:ollie* wrote:1.4 16 Valve is 100 BHP
More power than a Saxo VTR!!
what do they compare like???
yeah but i've heard the VTS **** all over the gti, still its a saxo...****!
Well you have to consider the fact the VTS is made of Kit-Kat wrappers and twigs, so it weighs about as much as a bag of sugar. Thus giving it a better power-to-weight ratio compared to the GTi.
I just know which I'd rather have a crash in.
Posted: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:21 pm
by henry01
there is that, kit kat wrapper would be a gd description for it, although its got less styling.
and its not just crashing, which would you rather be seen in? own? tell your friends?...well i'm out of ideas but you get the impression.
Posted: Fri Jun 23, 2006 6:56 pm
by jezmk4
James14100 wrote:Gti definatly better - 125BHP 0-60 8.9secs
Polo 16v 0-60 7.6secs
bye bye GTI
Posted: Fri Jun 23, 2006 6:58 pm
by Ross Clarke
How does the 100 bhp 1.6 compare?
Posted: Fri Jun 23, 2006 7:39 pm
by polokaj
could you guys get some proof were are u getting these figures from.
so what would the bhp be on a 98 1.4 16v polo 6n
Posted: Fri Jun 23, 2006 7:40 pm
by ModifiedMadness
jezmk4 wrote:James14100 wrote:Gti definatly better - 125BHP 0-60 8.9secs
Polo 16v 0-60 7.6secs
bye bye GTI
Isn't yours far from standard though?
