saxo 1.6 faster than gti??

jon_poloV · Post by **jon_poloV** » Tue Feb 07, 2006 6:18 pm

aldo10 wrote:when your talking about what car i faster you always mean in a starigh line and a agree a real race would mean going round corners but the topic was "saxo 1.6 (vts) faster than Gti" and the answer is YES. so stop making yourself out to be colin mcrae.

agree with this totally.

Jon

loud · Post by **loud** » Tue Feb 07, 2006 6:29 pm

a simple rule: if you beat a vts in a gti, it's a vtr with a vts badge

jezmk4 · Post by **jezmk4** » Tue Feb 07, 2006 6:37 pm

Sounds about right

Vts are pretty quick little s**t,

Gti is really no match for them, from a purely straight line point of view,

same for pug 106gti, they are smae as saxo,

Del_GTi · Post by **Del_GTi** » Tue Feb 07, 2006 6:50 pm

jon_poloV wrote:
aldo10 wrote:when your talking about what car i faster you always mean in a starigh line and a agree a real race would mean going round corners but the topic was "saxo 1.6 (vts) faster than Gti" and the answer is YES. so stop making yourself out to be colin mcrae.

agree with this totally.

Jon

Same here. Stop talking utter nonsense.

And most 2.0 are in bigger heavier family cars. So that's no surprise you beat them. I've wasted 320 BM's, 2.0 Vectra's, Mondeo etc but i wouldnt' bother telling anyone.

polopowah · Post by **polopowah** » Tue Feb 07, 2006 6:57 pm

off topic but at the end of the day whats the point in speeding these days
who cares how fast a car can go lol
i enjoy my car for what it is and speed means nothing i've taken a leaf out of Ludacris's book... track name '2 miles an hour'......so everybody sees you'

-Ben-

ModifiedMadness · Post by **ModifiedMadness** » Tue Feb 07, 2006 7:00 pm

They may be quicker, but to be honest I'd rather have a better looking better made car that isn't as common as speed cameras.

loud · Post by **loud** » Tue Feb 07, 2006 7:32 pm

that's how i used to think when i had my 1 litre mark 4, now i have a faster car i've realised how fun going fast can be

CalvinGTI · Post by **CalvinGTI** » Wed Feb 08, 2006 8:23 am

aldo10 wrote:when your talking about what car i faster you always mean in a starigh line and a agree a real race would mean going round corners but the topic was "saxo 1.6 (vts) faster than Gti" and the answer is YES. so stop making yourself out to be colin mcrae.

hahahaha is there any other race? im guessing your a straight line king *rolls eyes*

whatever dood, and anywayz im not colin MaCrae as you childishly put it, im more of a Damon Hill. . .as in RETIRED ! hahah been banned etc for too long and too many times, im now a GRANNY DRIVER SPECIALIST !. . Polopowah cud even overtake me in his 1ltr these days

Also Aldo10, you fitted that resistor to your car yet? . . . . .

Anywayz i conceed seeing as everyone is ganging up on me, your all right and im wrong, the VTS is faster than the gti and theres no way in the world a polo coould ever beat a vts away from the lights.. .i guess im just too biast towards Veedubs !!!! i just love em too much.

Happy now? :-p

*pimp slaps Jon_polo* haha

PS - Does everyone hate me?

. . .im gonna go eat some worms

Cal

jon_poloV · Post by **jon_poloV** » Wed Feb 08, 2006 11:36 am

Nah we love you really Calvin!
hope those worms taested good tho!

Cars looking good, nice to see the delocked handels.
bet thats good round romford cheifing monkeys!
Jon

PhilGTi · Post by **PhilGTi** » Wed Feb 08, 2006 1:01 pm

Right... Just to kick up this arguement again.

I just raced a lad home from college, went a very long route for about 20 miles.. at no point was he anywhere nere me on the straights... when we go back home he couldnt beleive i only had 125 bhp...

and his car was a....

VTS

CalvinGTI · Post by **CalvinGTI** » Wed Feb 08, 2006 1:13 pm

You might as well forget about it PhilGti, the forum has already spoken!

i opened my mouth and it got shat in for saying ive rinsed a VTS!! hahaha

Cheers for the reply too Jon_Polo, nice to see someone who doesnt take everything so seriously, Romford is a bit lame for criminals

ive had 3 aerials nicked haha ! and also my windows have been smashed 3 times, and everytime all theve done is pull the back seat forward to see if i had anything worth nicking in the boot !!!!

Bstards !!! lucky im fully comp with window cover !!!! only cost me Â£50 each time instead of the usual Â£185 for a rear side window, where on earth do they get these prices from ? how can a piece of glass cost that much? i know its toughened but still, my dad is a glazier and buys that sort of glass all the time, doesnt cost anywhere near as much.

oh yea nearly forgot, had the 2.8i soft top convertible Beemer weekend just gone. . . ahhhh was so lush cruising around in it lol. . problem is old bill (police) look at me in my wooly hat and trackies and think "MUST BE NICKED !!" haha

Hows things for you Jon anyhow? any closer to getting a Gti ?
Also did you see the post about TrackMania i left? supposed to be a phat racing game thats free, all my online gaming clan play it and tell me its a must !

Cal

M@Turner · Post by **M@Turner** » Wed Feb 08, 2006 7:00 pm

I love this forum........every now and then an argument spouts up and all over personal opinions and experiences. Then sooner or later, they bury the hatchet and get on with things.

The VTS in theory should be quicker than a GTi, but you can't just take into account power to weight ratio of the spec given. You never know if a car is completely standard, be it suspension, tyres, air filter, performance chips, wider wheels for going round corners....all slight mods can make a difference in races! Also, i don't know about you guys, but there's definately days where my car drives better and seems faster than others! My brother feels the same about his CTR.

Anyways, we all love our lickle Polos and who on this forum really cares which is fastest, speed isn't everything, just like certain other activities in life.

...........so lets all agree to disagree!

Mat

andyg · Post by **andyg** » Wed Feb 08, 2006 7:56 pm

Meh,

You can't go on personal accounts of whose car is faster. My car is DOG slow at the moment, I got beat off the lights by a 307 HDi. There are WAY too many variables that you don't know about.

First things first, not every VW polo GTi off the production run comes out with 125bhp. There is a variance in power in the engines (to a specified tolerance). Its possible you were lucky and have a GTi running slightly faster and the dude in the VTS had an underpowered car. Or maybe he treated it like sh1t and it runs badly as a result.

You gotta factor in all the other variables, there are too many but I will list a few: Milage on their car, amount of fuel in the tank, passengers (every 50kg is gonna add a second or 2 to 60). Tires, clutch, and then the drivers ability to change gear.

So if you beat a VTS good for you but if the test was done properly the VTS will beat the GTi 90% of the time.

Personaly I don't care too much, I just wish I could work out why my GTi is doing around 10 secs to 60

jon_poloV · Post by **jon_poloV** » Wed Feb 08, 2006 8:09 pm

Cal , maybe you should remove your parcel shelf and boot contents so at least they can see theres nothing in it. Lame as tho taking things like arieals etc. I sold my polo and bought a MX-5 theres pics in the members bits. wanted rear wheel drive 2 seater that was quick so bout the 1.8 DOHC 16V mk2 version. Good car to learn in etc before progressing to other rear wheel cars. Still got to love the polo tho.

BMW sounds wicked. they are really smart cars.

polo has real class t it where other small simular cars have no class what so ever.

Jon