UK-POLOS.NET - THE VW Polo Forum

jezmk4 · Post by **jezmk4** » Sat Jun 24, 2006 12:12 am

CymruPolo wrote:
ModifiedMadness wrote:
jezmk4 wrote: Polo 16v 0-60 7.6secs

bye bye GTI
Isn't yours far from standard though?
Yeah I was gonna say

not far at all

ximon · Post by **ximon** » Mon Jun 26, 2006 5:46 pm

whats the real bhp rating for the 1.4 8v polo, book is 60bhp but my mates 60bhp punto is crap in comparison.
</hijack>

Polo Paul · Post by **Polo Paul** » Mon Jun 26, 2006 8:38 pm

The 1.4 8v is 60 BHP and 14.4sec-60

The 1.4 16v is 100BHP and 10.2sec-60

The 1.6 GTI is 125BHP and 8.4sec to 60

Got the info off parkers, in reality they maybe a little faster as i think speed tests have to be done with a half load in the car so its as close to how it would be in the real world.

Its not just down to BHP in the case of the Punto, its weight, conditon of the engine and the gearing on the car. Not to mention the driver.

http://www.parkers.co.uk/choosing/carre ... 028&page=8

http://www.parkers.co.uk/choosing/carre ... 045&page=8

LeMeph · Post by **LeMeph** » Mon Jun 26, 2006 11:05 pm

I keep getting my ass kicked around town by the same god damn suzuki ingus sport. What freaking horse power that is im left wondering. I am nearly equal to him till third gear, then that fooker is gone. One day....

Chris,

Redline · Post by **Redline** » Mon Jun 26, 2006 11:24 pm

LeMeph wrote:I keep getting my ass kicked around town by the same god damn suzuki ingus sport. What freaking horse power that is im left wondering. I am nearly equal to him till third gear, then that fooker is gone. One day....

Chris,

Don't be fooled, those Ignis Sports are pretty nippy.

107bhp, in a car that weighs 945Kgs with short gearing.

LeMeph · Post by **LeMeph** » Tue Jun 27, 2006 9:00 am

god damnit no wonder...

Is there such thing as a line of cocaine for a car so im ready next time

Chris,

Polo Paul · Post by **Polo Paul** » Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:51 am

Yes a shot nitrous oxide

the mint with the hole · Wed Jun 28, 2006 8:27 pm

Ross Clarke wrote:How does the 100 bhp 1.6 compare?

The 1.6GLX multijet is rapido, 100bhp, much better than the 1.416v, not as highly stressed engine and all the parts are there for upping the power, turbine injection....

jezmk4 · Post by **jezmk4** » Wed Jun 28, 2006 8:36 pm

the mint with the hole wrote:
Ross Clarke wrote:How does the 100 bhp 1.6 compare?
The 1.6GLX multijet is rapido, 100bhp, much better than the 1.416v, not as highly stressed engine and all the parts are there for upping the power, turbine injection....

You've no idea what your talking about do you?

they didnt fit a 1.6 100bhp engine in a mk4 hatch, only in the big arsed saloon and estate,

Turbine injection?

do explain

Ross Clarke · Post by **Ross Clarke** » Wed Jun 28, 2006 10:52 pm

jezmk4 wrote:they didnt fit a 1.6 100bhp engine in a mk4 hatch, only in the big arsed saloon and estate

And whats wrong with a big arsed 1.6 estate?

vdubyabush · Post by **vdubyabush** » Wed Jun 28, 2006 11:29 pm

the mint with the hole · Thu Jun 29, 2006 12:29 am

jezmk4 wrote:
the mint with the hole wrote:
Ross Clarke wrote:How does the 100 bhp 1.6 compare?
The 1.6GLX multijet is rapido, 100bhp, much better than the 1.416v, not as highly stressed engine and all the parts are there for upping the power, turbine injection....
You've no idea what your talking about do you?

they didnt fit a 1.6 100bhp engine in a mk4 hatch, only in the big arsed saloon and estate,

Turbine injection? do explain

I dont know what im talkin about.. mate look at the list of things ive done to my car, i like to think ive lernt a couple of things along the way,

http://www.clubpolo.co.uk/articles/015.htm

Im sure the 1.6 glx had a "turbine injection" system, which no ones ever heard of before, my friend has one, its a very different inection system to mine, but mine is only spi... but they did a 75bhp model and then a very rare 100bhp model, his is the 100bhp one.. or so he thinks. there... explained.

Ross Clarke · Post by **Ross Clarke** » Thu Jun 29, 2006 7:28 am

My pick up had the AEE Polo engine with multipoint injection, still only 75bhp though.

But I must admit I did think at one point there was a 100bhp version of the 'smaller' 1.6 engine, could well be wrong though.

I must admit the reason I went for the larger 1.6 is because its a simple job to put the 1.8T in as its uses much of the same mountings etc.

jezmk4 · Post by **jezmk4** » Thu Jun 29, 2006 5:38 pm

the mint with the hole wrote:
jezmk4 wrote:
the mint with the hole wrote: The 1.6GLX multijet is rapido, 100bhp, much better than the 1.416v, not as highly stressed engine and all the parts are there for upping the power, turbine injection....
You've no idea what your talking about do you?

they didnt fit a 1.6 100bhp engine in a mk4 hatch, only in the big arsed saloon and estate,

Turbine injection? do explain
I dont know what im talkin about.. mate look at the list of things ive done to my car, i like to think ive lernt a couple of things along the way,

http://www.clubpolo.co.uk/articles/015.htm

Im sure the 1.6 glx had a "turbine injection" system, which no ones ever heard of before, my friend has one, its a very different inection system to mine, but mine is only spi... but they did a 75bhp model and then a very rare 100bhp model, his is the 100bhp one.. or so he thinks. there... explained.

there talking about the saloon with the 100bhp engine

i still interested to know what this turbine injection system is...

Ross Clarke · Post by **Ross Clarke** » Thu Jun 29, 2006 6:45 pm

Im guessing its a referance to the variable inlet manifold, long and short tracts for better torque.

BHP

<hijack>