MOT Advisory
MOT Advisory
I had an advisory that the front passenger suspension bush had perished. Just had a look now and this is the only thing I can see wrong.
Is that the bit that needs replacing? It's split. How hard is it to replace?
Any help greatly apreciated It's a mk2 BTW.
Is that the bit that needs replacing? It's split. How hard is it to replace?
Any help greatly apreciated It's a mk2 BTW.
-
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 1116
- Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 9:04 pm
- Location: Manchester Drives: '83 GL Classic
that's a CV joint boot. You can get a replacement from GSF. its quite awkward to replace though, the CV joint needs to be removed from the wheel hub (which may require you to separate the anti roll bar/track control arm from the suspension strut) Then the CV joint needs to be separated from the driveshaft so you can remove the old boot/fit the new one.
That's nothing like a 'front passenger suspension bush' though.
That's nothing like a 'front passenger suspension bush' though.
-
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 1116
- Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 9:04 pm
- Location: Manchester Drives: '83 GL Classic
-
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 1116
- Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 9:04 pm
- Location: Manchester Drives: '83 GL Classic
-
- Silver Member
- Posts: 255
- Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2005 1:46 pm
I got the same advisory for our 22 years old Polo.
I really wonder if a worn bush in the upper suspension strut can be detected by only moving the wheels. Surely, the tester couldn't show me those bushes as the are hidden.
I only noticed that testing at this MOT station, where I'm since three years now with our three cars, has become a little bit awkward and bizarre this year since the computerisation of the MOT testing.
On one other car, the tester raised a non-existing fuel leak.
On the second other car, it was a non-existing hydraulic fluid leak and a non-working side repeater that worked before and after the MOT test.
Well, all things are easy to fix if you do it on your own.
But on the Polo he raised strange things like "worn suspension strut bushes" and a imbalanced handbrake.
I should only open one drum and make it going again.
As the drum brake shoes would last only a year or two, I decided to give everything, the bushes and the drum brakes, to my low cost garage (15 £ for one hour of labour).
So the garage put new bushes on the suspension struts and by the way new bushes on the wish bones, too.
All together did cost me 130 £ with all parts.
As I want to keep this car (and our others, too) as long as possible, so I don't mind really to replace anything on the car, but I got the impression that MOT testing has become more picky since the computerisation. People reading statistics from MOT stations might think that such old cars MUST have lots of faults.
I really wonder if a worn bush in the upper suspension strut can be detected by only moving the wheels. Surely, the tester couldn't show me those bushes as the are hidden.
I only noticed that testing at this MOT station, where I'm since three years now with our three cars, has become a little bit awkward and bizarre this year since the computerisation of the MOT testing.
On one other car, the tester raised a non-existing fuel leak.
On the second other car, it was a non-existing hydraulic fluid leak and a non-working side repeater that worked before and after the MOT test.
Well, all things are easy to fix if you do it on your own.
But on the Polo he raised strange things like "worn suspension strut bushes" and a imbalanced handbrake.
I should only open one drum and make it going again.
As the drum brake shoes would last only a year or two, I decided to give everything, the bushes and the drum brakes, to my low cost garage (15 £ for one hour of labour).
So the garage put new bushes on the suspension struts and by the way new bushes on the wish bones, too.
All together did cost me 130 £ with all parts.
As I want to keep this car (and our others, too) as long as possible, so I don't mind really to replace anything on the car, but I got the impression that MOT testing has become more picky since the computerisation. People reading statistics from MOT stations might think that such old cars MUST have lots of faults.
Re: MOT Advisory
hello-
as was mentioned before,get the cv boot sorted before the cv joint dries up and becomes damaged.
what amazes me is the mot tester never spotted this.......this is a definate check that any mot tester should do and be able to spot!!!!
it is also(i think)a mot failure if there is any splits or cracks in the cv boot,or if the clips are loose or damaged....or even missing!!!!!!!
go elsewhere next time,better to be save than sorry......
william
as was mentioned before,get the cv boot sorted before the cv joint dries up and becomes damaged.
what amazes me is the mot tester never spotted this.......this is a definate check that any mot tester should do and be able to spot!!!!
it is also(i think)a mot failure if there is any splits or cracks in the cv boot,or if the clips are loose or damaged....or even missing!!!!!!!
go elsewhere next time,better to be save than sorry......
william