what profile 'cam' to run in a 3F...?

Chat about your MKIII (86C) inc GT/G40 Polo
pete69zx
Silver Member
Posts: 270
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 4:24 pm
Location: Teeside, Stockton-On-Tees

what profile 'cam' to run in a 3F...?

Post by pete69zx »

Just thinking away here to myself...

Any suggestions on what profile of 'cam' i should run in a 3F engine?

I plan to have some kind of 'stage' head (allthough not sure what 1,2 or 3) & would like to know what profile 'schrick' camshaft i should be running... & most importantly... where can i buy one from using a switch card online plz?

Do schrick also do adjustable verniers aswell?

If not... what would you reccomend (manufacturer) ?

Cheers.
Pete :idea:

I want good torque with good BHP aswell :twisted:
Last edited by pete69zx on Tue Jan 18, 2005 5:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
hardhitter
Moderator
Posts: 1249
Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2002 10:35 pm
Location: Derbyshire 3F Guru
Contact:

Post by hardhitter »

Well, Schrick do three types of cam for the polo that can be used in the 3F. It all depends on how far you are modifying the head (big valves or not) and what amount of top end or torque you wan't.

They do the follwing profiles; 264/260, 268 and 268/264. Each have different lifts and valve timing which is worth noting. The split duration ones will let the inlet valves stay open longer.

Deciding which one to go for is tricky and something I've thought about quite a few times.

They don't make adjustable vernier pullies, some german tuning companies do but make sure you get the one with the right tooth profile.
pete69zx
Silver Member
Posts: 270
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 4:24 pm
Location: Teeside, Stockton-On-Tees

Post by pete69zx »

Thanx for the input.

My knowledge of understanding the various profiles of camshafts lobes isnt as good as i would like it to be, lol.

I understand what you are saying about the degress, but to apply that to the real world...?

for example...

Could it be described as thus...

The longer the inlet stays open vs the exhaust, does this achieve more BHP or/& torque?

The shorter the inlet stays open vs the exhaust, does this achieve more BHP or/& torque?

I need to understand them more to help make an informed choice :roll:

Any help on this would be greatly appreciated :wink:

Cheers.
Pete :idea:
hardhitter
Moderator
Posts: 1249
Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2002 10:35 pm
Location: Derbyshire 3F Guru
Contact:

Post by hardhitter »

You won't know in real world terms until you try one. Thats why it's a tough choice. It's never clear cut which profiles will do what until you have experimented.
If you are getting a head done with standard size valves, then maybe a 264/260 or 268 would be suitable. I think the 264/260 will be more torquey low down to mid, suitable if you aren't going too mad with mods. If you are increasing the rev limit and tuning more for top end try the 268.
DanW
Gold Member
Posts: 551
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2003 2:09 pm
Location: Aberystwyth

Post by DanW »

would the same Cam's work in an NZ by any chance?
hardhitter
Moderator
Posts: 1249
Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2002 10:35 pm
Location: Derbyshire 3F Guru
Contact:

Post by hardhitter »

Of course they will.
DanW
Gold Member
Posts: 551
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2003 2:09 pm
Location: Aberystwyth

Post by DanW »

hardhitter wrote:Of course they will.
gd gd. Just curiose (sp*)
amstrange1
Silver Member
Posts: 477
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 12:15 am
Location: Leamington Spa

Post by amstrange1 »

In fact, some German tuning companies claim 80PS from a K&N style panel filter; cam; and GT inlet on an NZ engine.
DanW
Gold Member
Posts: 551
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2003 2:09 pm
Location: Aberystwyth

Post by DanW »

amstrange1 wrote:In fact, some German tuning companies claim 80PS from a K&N style panel filter; cam; and GT inlet on an NZ engine.
what's 80PS in BHP?
Gareth_GT_Hatch
Platinum Member
Posts: 1116
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 9:04 pm
Location: Manchester Drives: '83 GL Classic

Post by Gareth_GT_Hatch »

about 79bhp. 8)

hp=PS/1.0139
DanW
Gold Member
Posts: 551
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2003 2:09 pm
Location: Aberystwyth

Post by DanW »

wouldn't you loose torque with the GT inlet though?
pete69zx
Silver Member
Posts: 270
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 4:24 pm
Location: Teeside, Stockton-On-Tees

Post by pete69zx »

hardhitter wrote:If you are increasing the rev limit and tuning more for top end try the 268.
Sounds like what im looking for... 268 it shall be :twisted:
tarquin bevilastard
Getting There!
Posts: 81
Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 10:03 pm
Location: BEESTON:NOTTINGHAM
Contact:

Post by tarquin bevilastard »

my wifes yellow mk2 classic had
nz engine,
kn panel filter,
piper 272 fast road cam,
gt inlet manifold,
hybrid freeflow exhaust,
it recorded 81 bhp at well lane turbo centre,
on a g40 rolling road day.
DanW
Gold Member
Posts: 551
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2003 2:09 pm
Location: Aberystwyth

Post by DanW »

with this cam business, is it a matter of just putting it in there? Or is there other things to do too?
tarquin bevilastard
Getting There!
Posts: 81
Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 10:03 pm
Location: BEESTON:NOTTINGHAM
Contact:

Post by tarquin bevilastard »

i've never changed/seen one changed but i would've thought it's a case of changing the cam and checking/setting the timing .there may be more to it than that,i'm sure someone in the know will be along soon
Post Reply