I'm really curious what it is that makes this a bad combination. Bear with me...
I've had 15" alloys on my car for nigh on 5 years now, and personally I rate the way the car drives on its alloys. It has masses of grip, it's very stable on the motorway, doesn't wheelspin very easily. I've had arch work on the back, but not on the front, and it's fine with 5 adults in the car (until you come to a speed bump, but that's nothing to do with the wheels). I don't get any scrubbage inside the arch on full lock either.
In fact, the only things I can really pick fault with are how much tyres cost (£70 plus for decent ones in 195/45/15) and the dickheads that my car proves to be a magnet for. I don't even find that it tramlines horrifically, having run my 13s for a week or so back in January the same roads I notice tramlining with 15s I notice it with the 13s too. Ride quality isn't great, but it's not great on the 13s either.
Yet I am constantly reading posts where people say 15s cock up a Polo's handling, and I'm sat here thinking... does it? Purely based on my own experiences, I haven't found this to be the case. But then what do I know!
If I were, say, to go and put a set of 14" wheels on my car with 195/45/14 tyres, would I get much of a change in terms of how the car drives? Surely with that width of tyre it's not gonna make much difference to tramlining and ride quality? Plus it's still a larger wheel than standard, so surely it'll still have the same detrumental effects as 15s? Or does it?
Same goes for 13s really, I found my steelies a complete nightmare in terms of traction having got used to 15" wheels. I didn't feel confident going around a roundabout at anything over old-person speeds either. Wider 13s are available, but again wouldn't that make for the same handling problems as other wheels?
I'm not planning a change, as I'm a believer in if it ain't broke don't mend it, but I'm always open to suggestions.
Enlighten me!


